Health Science Authority
Home

25 Mar 2008: Update on rosiglitazone and cardiovascular risks

Rosiglitazone (Avandia®, GlaxoSmithKline), has been registered by HSA since 2000 for use as an adjunct to diet and exercise in treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus; as monotherapy or in combination with metformin or a sulfonylurea to reduce insulin resistance; and to lower elevated blood glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Avandamet®, also by GlaxoSmithKine (GSK), contains a combination of rosiglitazone and metformin.


Background

In May 2007, the New England Journal of Medicine published an article by Nissen and Wolski1 which suggested the possibility of an increased risk of adverse cardiac events associated with rosiglitazone. The increased risk of a myocardial infarction (odds ratio 1.43, p=0.03) and cardiovascular death (odds ratio 1.64, p=0.06) was arrived at in a meta-analysis of 42 clinical studies which had about 15,500 patients treated with rosiglitazone compared with 12,282 patients on regimens that did not include rosiglitazone.


Various analyses to verify the association of rosiglitazone with cardiovascular risks

A) US FDA advisory committee meeting2

Pooled data from 42 clinical trials

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) convened a public Endocrinologic and Metabolic Drugs Advisory Committee and the Drug Safety and Risk Management Advisory Committee meeting on 30 July 2007 to review the cardiovascular profile of rosiglitazone. The FDA conducted their own analysis on the 42 double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trials which were used in Nissen and Wolski's paper. In their analysis, an increased risk of myocardial ischaemia with rosiglitazone versus pooled comparators was observed (odds ratio 1.4, 95% CI 1.1, 1.8). An increased risk of myocardial ischaemic* events with rosiglitazone was observed in the placebo-controlled studies, but not in the active-controlled studies. (* angina pectoris, angina pectoris aggravated, unstable angina, cardiac arrest, chest pain, coronary artery occlusion, dyspnoea, myocardial infarction, coronary thrombosis, myocardial ischaemia, coronary artery disease / disorder.)


Large long-term prospective randomized controlled trials

Data from three other large long-term prospective randomized controlled trials were also analysed for myocardial ischaemic events – ADOPT (A Diabetes Outcomes Progression Trial), DREAM (Diabetes Reduction Assessment with Rosiglitazone and Ramipril Medication), RECORD (Rosiglitazone Evaluated for Cardiac Outcomes and Regulation of Glycemia in Diabetes). For all three trials, analyses were performed using a composite of major adverse cardiovascular events, (i.e. cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction and stroke, known as MACE) as endpoint. In their entirety, the available data on the risk of myocardial ischaemia were not conclusive.


B) Publication of ‘Long-term Risk of Cardiovascular Events with Rosiglitazone’ in JAMA

On 12 September 2007, the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) published a systemic review and meta-analysis of the long-term cardiovascular risks for rosiglitazone, including myocardial infarction, heart failure and cardiovascular mortality. Rosiglitazone appeared to significantly increase the risk of myocardial infarction (RR 1.42, p=0.02) and heart failure (RR 2.09, p<0.001) without a significant increase in risk of cardiovascular mortality (RR 0.90, p=0.53).3


C) Other on-going long-term clinical trials

GSK has several other on-going long-term studies which are intended to increase the available data on the cardiovascular safety of rosiglitazone, with most of them ending in 2008. RECORD is the largest prospective long-term study for type 2 diabetes patients specifically to determine the cardiovascular outcomes of death and hospitalisation in rosiglitazone containing regimens versus patients treated with the combination of metformin and sulfonylurea. The study is due to finish in late 2008 with results expected in early 2009.


Actions taken by international regulatory agencies

The UK Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), European Medicines Agency (EMEA), Health Canada and the US FDA have all taken the similar stance that there were insufficient evidence to indicate that the risks of myocardial infarction or death are different between rosiglitazone and some other oral type 2 diabetes mellitus treatments, and the benefits of rosiglitazone in the treatment of type 2 diabetes continue to outweigh their risks. However, in all the various jurisdictions, the product information of rosiglitazone-containing products will be updated to include warning that in patients with ischaemic heart disease, rosiglitazone should only be used after careful evaluation of each patient's individual risk.

In Canada, it has been announced that rosiglitazone is no longer approved as monotherapy for type 2 diabetes, nor for use in combination with sulfonylurea, except when metformin use is contraindicated or not tolerated. Treatment with all rosiglitazone products is now contraindicated in patients with any stage of heart failure (i.e. NYHA Class I, II, III or IV). The product information for Avandia® is currently under review by Health Canada.


Conclusion

Based on the available data to-date, there is insufficient evidence at this point to conclude that the risks of myocardial infarction and cardiovascular death is higher for rosiglitazone compared to other type 2 diabetes treatments. However, to enhance safer use of this drug, HSA is working with the company to strengthen the prescribing information in the local package inserts of Avandia® and Avandamet®. Information on cardiac ischaemia will be included in the adverse reactions and clinical studies sections of the package insert, and the initiation of rosiglitazone will be contraindicated in patients with NYHA Class III and IV heart failure.

Healthcare professionals are encouraged to report all serious adverse effects suspected to be associated with the thiazolidinediones class of medicines, namely, rosiglitazone and pioglitazone, to the Pharmacovigilance Unit.


References

1. N Engl J Med 2007 Jun;356(24):2457-71.
2. FDA briefing document. http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/07/briefing/2007-4308b1-02-fda-backgrounder.pdf (accessed on 16 January 2007)
3. JAMA 2007 Sep;298(10):1189-95.


Last updated on 02 Jul 2010 16:58:27
Best viewed using Internet Explorer 7.0 and above. | Privacy Statement | Terms of Use | HSA Data Protection Policy | Rate Our Website
Health Sciences Authority © 2007-2011. All Rights Reserved.