Background
Various analyses to verify the association of rosiglitazone with cardiovascular risks
A) US FDA advisory committee meeting2
Pooled data from 42 clinical trials
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) convened a public Endocrinologic and Metabolic Drugs Advisory Committee and the Drug Safety and Risk Management Advisory Committee meeting on 30 July 2007 to review the cardiovascular profile of rosiglitazone. The FDA conducted their own analysis on the 42 double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trials which were used in Nissen and Wolski's paper. In their analysis, an increased risk of myocardial ischaemia with rosiglitazone versus pooled comparators was observed (odds ratio 1.4, 95% CI 1.1, 1.8). An increased risk of myocardial ischaemic* events with rosiglitazone was observed in the placebo-controlled studies, but not in the active-controlled studies. (* angina pectoris, angina pectoris aggravated, unstable angina, cardiac arrest, chest pain, coronary artery occlusion, dyspnoea, myocardial infarction, coronary thrombosis, myocardial ischaemia, coronary artery disease / disorder.)
Data from three other large long-term prospective randomized controlled trials were also analysed for myocardial ischaemic events – ADOPT (A Diabetes Outcomes Progression Trial), DREAM (Diabetes Reduction Assessment with Rosiglitazone and Ramipril Medication), RECORD (Rosiglitazone Evaluated for Cardiac Outcomes and Regulation of Glycemia in Diabetes). For all three trials, analyses were performed using a composite of major adverse cardiovascular events, (i.e. cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction and stroke, known as MACE) as endpoint. In their entirety, the available data on the risk of myocardial ischaemia were not conclusive.
B) Publication of ‘Long-term Risk of Cardiovascular Events with Rosiglitazone’ in JAMA
C) Other on-going long-term clinical trials
Actions taken by international regulatory agencies
The UK Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), European Medicines Agency (EMEA), Health Canada and the US FDA have all taken the similar stance that there were insufficient evidence to indicate that the risks of myocardial infarction or death are different between rosiglitazone and some other oral type 2 diabetes mellitus treatments, and the benefits of rosiglitazone in the treatment of type 2 diabetes continue to outweigh their risks. However, in all the various jurisdictions, the product information of rosiglitazone-containing products will be updated to include warning that in patients with ischaemic heart disease, rosiglitazone should only be used after careful evaluation of each patient's individual risk.
In Canada, it has been announced that rosiglitazone is no longer approved as monotherapy for type 2 diabetes, nor for use in combination with sulfonylurea, except when metformin use is contraindicated or not tolerated. Treatment with all rosiglitazone products is now contraindicated in patients with any stage of heart failure (i.e. NYHA Class I, II, III or IV). The product information for Avandia® is currently under review by Health Canada.
Conclusion
Based on the available data to-date, there is insufficient evidence at this point to conclude that the risks of myocardial infarction and cardiovascular death is higher for rosiglitazone compared to other type 2 diabetes treatments. However, to enhance safer use of this drug, HSA is working with the company to strengthen the prescribing information in the local package inserts of Avandia® and Avandamet®. Information on cardiac ischaemia will be included in the adverse reactions and clinical studies sections of the package insert, and the initiation of rosiglitazone will be contraindicated in patients with NYHA Class III and IV heart failure.
Healthcare professionals are encouraged to report all serious adverse effects suspected to be associated with the thiazolidinediones class of medicines, namely, rosiglitazone and pioglitazone, to the Pharmacovigilance Unit.
References
2. FDA briefing document. http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/07/briefing/2007-4308b1-02-fda-backgrounder.pdf (accessed on 16 January 2007)
3. JAMA 2007 Sep;298(10):1189-95.


